Giacometti stated he was attempting to render his models, which tended to be his brother, Diego, his wife, Annette, or his mistress, Caroline (why did all the great 20th century artists have mistresses?), exactly the way he saw them, and the way he thought they ought to be seen. Academics suggest that this was a reflection of a 20th century existentialist view that focussed on the notion that modern life is increasingly devoid of meaning. One must also consider that Giacometti’s work would have been affected not only by the seeming absurdity, chaos, and destructive force of WWII but also the deep seeded belief that all life could very possibly be distinguished through nuclear holocaust. His figures; drawings, paintings and sculptures all convey feelings of alienation in a hostile world very much in line with the mentality of a mid 20th century zeitgeist.
What do you think of Giacometti’s work? It can be quite
difficult to get your head around but if you have the chance read James Lord's
"A Giacometti Portrait". It's a small book but really helps to
establish not only what Giacometti was trying to do but Lord also details
exceptionally well the personal struggle Alberto suffered with making each
piece. I highly recommend it!



I like all of his work
ReplyDeleteLike it a lot. Don't know what to think about this existentialist/alienation stuff. I think I get what people mean -- that the work looks like Sartre meets Mad Max. But, check out amore fati (wikipedia). I mean, just 'cause you look into (and even embrace) the abyss, does that make you alienated ... or just truly at-home-inated)? Thanks for the nice presentation, Trevor.
ReplyDeletePowerful isn't it Shea.
ReplyDeleteAnd thanks Anonymous! :)
WOW i did a project on his work is school, never seen this picture! isnt he amazing!
ReplyDeleteAgreed!
DeleteGreat picture!
ReplyDelete